Anonymous said: What. People only have the 'right' to hate entire demographics as much as anyone has the right to be a bigot or an idiot, but no one has the right to be free from people pointing out how bigoted and idiotic you are. You only have the right to your own thoughts and expressing them as much as you accept that other people have the same 'right.' It's a Western luxury that we have this right, and it goes both ways. But when it comes down to it, there is no justification for being a bigot.
Type of girls to avoid:
Girls who laugh at men’s issues
Girls who are jealous and petty
Girls who think men have to be a certain way
Girls who viciously attack other people verbally
Girls who are narrow minded
Girls who think having a vagina gives them all the power
Girls who ridicule you for your interests
Girls who think Batman can beat Superman
Girls who try to define your masculinity
But Batman can beat Superman.
Superman sucks so hard
^I agree. Batman is a BAMF.
But yeah, the rest of those sound like pretty crappy folks to deal with.
A woman should not be condemned for not calling herself a feminist. If you really stood for the liberation of women, for their rights to make their own choices, you would respect women who choose not be part of modern day feminism. It is not my job to adhere to your standards of what a woman should be just because you’ve joined a cult-like, toxic, sexist environment while I’ve decided to step away from it. I do not need to explain my choice just like I won’t expect you to do so either. I respect your decision, it’s only fair your respect mine.
So I just listened to my parents bitch about how the “gays” stole the rainbow for about an hour and a half all because I suggested Mom sew a gender-neutral blanket for my new cousin.
avoiceforneutrality said: I saw a post about anarchy on here earlier, which style of anarchist are you? Anarcho-capitalist, self sustaining, etc, or more socialist anarchy? Honestly I haven't found a lot of people to talk about that kind of thing with because there's two parties and both are statist.
I lean more towards anarcho-socialist. I believe that communities should lead themselves rather than a big government. In my dream world, battering works better than using actual currency. People would be more self-sustaining and in the times they’re in need of resources or services they can’t provide themselves, they’ll barter their own excess resources or services. But there should also be like a “pool” of community resources and such for those who can’t do so. But it can only be used temporarily. Of course things like education and medical care would be provided to everyone, equally. I know there are kinks and such in that idea and economics and politics are more complex than that so that would need to be worked out. But I also think that communities would be more civilized in working out any problems should they arise. No more war would be necessary. Then again, this is a dream world and doesnt take all of human error into account. I do think it is possible but it would take a long process to put into place.